Home News Welsh Blogs Never say rugger

 

Disappointment rules

Posted by wilbach on November 26, 2006 12:12 PM | 

Ultimately, it was a day of disappointmentsno 56, please - counter attacks from cheated ball in all black bean sauce

It started with such promise; evening kick off, sense of excitement, controversy about the Village Idiots comment, the opportunity to show the respect for the Haka not shown in France or ‘HQ’, the chance to score against the best team in the world, the chance to see the best team in the world in the best rugby venue in the world, having a fair few beers with friends to name just a few of the little points of frisson that can make for a crackin’ rugby day.

How sad then that the Haka was, for whatever reason, performed behind closed doors. How, oh so very disrespectful to the supporters of both countries. I want to see the Haka and I am bloody annoyed that some jokers in both unions screwed it up. I mean, we managed to get a bull on the field, for goodness sakes. And what a spectacular poo he had in front of the West stand, too. Very impressive. I do hope the groundsman dug it into the pitch. It looked as if it needed it. It may be the Best Rugby Venue in the World but the pitch is shoite – Roath Rec looked better. And it only has dog poo on it.

How sad then that the Best Team in The World cannot help but cheat, cheat, cheat. Why, if they can beat teams hollow with superior, well, everything, do the All Blacks insist on cheating? Is it compulsive behaviour? Or are they just practicing being the Best in the World at Cynicism, too? Perhaps they feel that they need to keep their hands in (literally and metaphorically, Mr McCaw) so that, if they need to, say, get a penalty just outside the 22/25 to win a game by, oooh, I don’t know, diving out of a lineout, they won’t be so rusty in the Art of Cheating as to blow it and, heaven forbid, lose to a better team?

Surely not.

And I always thought that it was an offence to push at a scrum before the put in…

How sad then that the feel of an All Blacks game is, I’m sorry to say, just not satisfying in the way a good three-courser of Union can and should be. The thing that sets rugby apart is the sense of pressure, of the building of something, the creation of a dynamic that is so different from cricket, football, league. The current All Blacks are almost too efficient; they have re-defined rugby in a more dramatic and complete way than anyone seems to have noticed. Forget the prop-posed changes to the scrum; Henry et al have changed the way the game is played fundamentally. Am I alone in ultimately feeling still hungry for rugby after watching their games? I can’t see any way of really explaining why it leaves me cold but it does. They base their game on being accurate and efficient in all the basics, defending smartly and with a real emphasis on the inside man working harder than anyone else, tackling brutally, cheating and then using the most precise running and passing game to score tries. It is immediately thrilling. But ultimately, whisper it, rather boring to watch.

Oh, I know.

But at least England lost.

I remain, yours truly,

The Village Idiot.


 

Comments (11)

Paul Nolan wrote...

Totally agree, but don't understand why a Welsh forward didn't rearrange Richie McCheat's face.
wilbach says - i think several english and french lads tried... i am not sure i can condone facial disfigurement, though.
ripping the skin off his hands and shoulders with studs sounds good, however.

Posted by: Paul Nolan  | November 26, 2006 3:29 PM

Rob wrote...

I think the NZ side execute the game in the same way that Steve Davis played at his best when snooker world champion. Efficient, ruthless and accurate, particularly when punishing opposition errors but never really creatively exciting. You can admire it, but it doesn't make your heart swell - not like the French can at their most creative. A mate of mine, Richard, went to follow the Lions to NZ - he reckons that during the final test he turned to a rather loud and annoyingly smug All Black supporter and said, "Don't you get bloody bored of watchin' this monotonous success!". I kinda agree with him.
wilbach says - 'nuff said, bra.

Posted by: Rob  | November 26, 2006 8:18 PM

Julian wrote...

They always and traditionally were mechanically effective. I am not sure if you were born when the push occured, but that side and previously dominant AB sides were never things of beauty. They are reverting to type, as are you. It has always been the Welsh weakness for romance above victory that has played into the hands of functionaries. Dai Watkins sidestep never did not them. Me I would be happy for a win sealed by a henson 55yarder 9-8. No beauty just happiness.
wilbach says - likewise, i would be (and have been) happy with a henson special, or a dubious kick and chase by evans or a thorburn thump against the aussies in '87, but i think a win WITH beauty should still be the goal and i still reserve the right to desire it in my/the chosen sport. aim high, tiger...

Posted by: Julian  | November 26, 2006 8:47 PM

Chris glynn-jones wrote...

Priceless summing up Wilbach. True about Roath park Rec too.

Posted by: Chris glynn-jones  | November 27, 2006 11:58 AM

Jim Haughie wrote...

The comments by Wilbach , Rob and Paul Nolan giving a Welsh perspective confirms to me why New zealand should stop playing Wales.
You don't like us, we don't respect you and it is another fact that the rest of the world finds you too introverted and insecure .
Our continued rugby success must be very annoying but the answer to that is for you to get better or stop whinging and bleating.
The ground last saturday was typical of everything Welsh as we see it.
You need an entire make over, public relations and all.
wilbach says - hello, mate. if the truth be known, you would have been right in dropping the fixture years ago. so why haven't you? but then perhaps it would all get a bit boring playing the tri-nations over and over and over.. oh, sorry, you DO.

i think you missed the point - i never bleat, by the way, rage, most definately, but never bleat - i agree with kiwidave when he says we need to learn from you boys; but then we must try and retain our parochial ideals, too. vive la difference & plus ca change etc etc.
trust me, i would give my eye teeth to enjoy a tenth of AB success but still desire those little moments of beauty that the game can provide. that ONLY this game can provide.

but thanks for writing and keep on peaking! cheers, Jim.

Posted by: Jim Haughie  | November 27, 2006 10:25 PM

kiwidave wrote...

Monotonous success sure beats monotonous losing. Seems to me that whenever the ABs play the Welsh, the papers then report how the Welsh team can learn
from the experience. What do they learn each time? In my mind the AB's now exert huge pressure on opponents who have the ball. Their tackling is immense and drives their opponent backwards. The Kiwis thrive off turnover
ball when defences aren't organisied and simply scrambling. The ability to offload in the tackle and run at pace from depth is devastating and they have proved to all 3 nations this November that you can't afford to make
mistakes. But dare i say it. I'm not bovvered if they don't do the haka. I enjoy seeing it but in some ways the whole haka thing is more of a sideshow to the game. Certainly it gets the flashbulbs going but I'm actually tuning in for the rugby not for which haka they do, is it a throat slitting gesture, what does it all mean etc. Just get on with the game.
wilbach says - i agree with 90% of what you say, dave. i had a big chat with my mate Big Col about how it would require time for my Pre-Makeover rugby-watching sensibilities to adjust to the New Game; where a team can comfortably win on 35% possession, indeed aims to win on 35%. I daresay it will be the way ahead for a while and then the game will mutate into somthing with a different feel to it again... i actually LIKE the fact that the game is diverging from the homogenous same-ness - i would prefer every rugby nation to play to their own style and strengths. i have no idea, for instance, what england are up to (but then again, neither do they) - they are not suited to play the rugby they are trying to play, so forget it and revert to type. i think the irish should revert to more foot-rushes and mayhem, too. the old joke about the irish motto of 'kick ahead. ANY fockin head!' would be worth re-appraising. more difference, i say. and, please, don't peak just yet AB's...

Posted by: kiwidave  | November 28, 2006 9:51 PM

meatbomb wrote...

How's it going bro'?

You are not alone in feeling as though the game is less dramatic. I can't imagine you are looking for perfection of movement in your ideal moment of beauty; rather a moment of emotional beauty as an act of heroism and skill punctuates the balance of the game.

And that's all good, but as something of a functionist I've got to say that not many balanced games are going to happen against the Blacks until more sides get their act together.

A touch hard to pin a lack on the ABs because the competition isn't up to scratch

wilbach says - couldn't really agree with you more, tiger. just wish they didn't have to cheat when there is galringly and palpably no need for it... especially against the village idiots.

thank you for you erudition, blue!

Posted by: meatbomb  | November 29, 2006 8:29 AM

Reweti wrote...

Hey Guys
We must have been watching different games at the weekend, as not once did I see any ABs "cheating" (your word not mine). Yes, I saw our players trying it on with the ref to see how far they could go and many of them got pinged - but we accept that this happens in every match in NZ, juniors, club or first 15 match and we store that knowledge and move on. If the ref is too unfit or dimwitted to keep up and make good decisions and not take guesses, then the ABs will continue to push the envelope. Bless him, he was blatantly wrong on at least two occasions, first the binning of Richie Mc and awarding the penalty try. Richie was not infringing at that particular time and the penalty try decicision was flakey at best.
We are taught from the cradle to play the game hard and tough. And the opinion of most old heads is that the rules are only guidelines. In the words of the the great Tana Umaga "this is not tiddlywinks we're playin". That is embedded in our psyche. I keep hearing about the Welsh passion for rugby - haven't seen it for a long time Boyo. So whats up with that??
wilbach says - look, all you NZers out there, stop being so bludi articulate and convincing,OK?! I tell you what, I'll watch the tape again and come back to this...

Posted by: Reweti  | November 30, 2006 3:13 AM

Reweti wrote...

He Bro I wish some of your readers would get over themselves "Grow up girls". Last week it was the ABs being accused of cheating - now its our Ozzie mates. Look when are you Euro-pussies going to admit that down here in NZ/Oz we are stronger, faster, fitter and more creative and inventive than players up there. So darlings, stop bleating on about cheating and get on with trying to catch up. Fewer visits to the pie shop would be a start!

wilbach says - you will have to clarify which comments you mean, tiger! Though I personally prefer a good southern indian curry house.

Posted by: Reweti  | December 3, 2006 10:33 PM

Paul Nolan wrote...

Southern hemisphere players are stronger, faster and fitter as you say. (Paul goes on to suggest where they may dave developed these traits).
Wilbach says - an interesting observation that draws on Darwinian theory but, thankfully, one that has no place here.

Posted by: Paul Nolan  | December 6, 2006 7:15 PM

Andrew wrote...

A little behind everybody - I know. But I'm getting to the age where like Corporal Jones in Dad's Army, I feel justified in being half a step behind the rest. The comments made here are interesting and highlight the perennial issue (in any sport really not just rugby) for those of us who love to see beauty, artistry, genius, and all other things that make the hair on the back of our necks stand on end, that question being whether winning at all cost is the dominant thing in sport? Without a doubt the ABs, as has been commented here are clinical and efficient to the Enth degree - but as one who is old enough to remember these things - if you asked me would I prefer to live with the memory of Barry John in his heyday and NO wins against the ABs for 100 years or Graham Henry's clinical ABs with no defeats for 1000 years then to my dying day I would have to say give me Barry John and those losses every time.

Wilbach says - Romance lives in the Soul. bless you, tiger!

Posted by: Andrew  | January 16, 2007 3:02 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Search this blog

April 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
 

Older posts are in the Archives

  



About Me


Never say rugger

... because a REAL welshman wouldn't

My favourites